An Essay on Divine Authority



❰PDF / Epub❯ ✅ An Essay on Divine Authority Author Mark C. Murphy – E17streets4all.co.uk In the first book wholly concerned with divine authority, Mark C Murphy explores the extent of God s rule over created rational beings The author challenges the view widely supported by theists and no In the first book wholly concerned with divine on Divine PDF ☆ authority, Mark C Murphy explores the extent of God s rule over created rational beings The author challenges the view widely supported by theists and nontheists alike that if God exists, then humans must be bound by an obligation of obedience to this being He demonstrates that this view, the authority thesis, cannot be sustained by any of the arguments routinely advanced on its An Essay PDF \ behalf, including those drawn from perfect being theology, metaethical theory, normative principles, and even Scripture and tradition After exposing the inadequacies of the various arguments for the authority thesis, he develops his own solution to the problem of whether, and to what extent, God is authoritative For Murphy, divine authority is a contingent matter while created rational beings have decisive reason to subject themselves to the divine rule, they are under divine authority Essay on Divine PDF È only insofar as they have chosen to allow God s decisions to take the place of their own in their practical reasoning The author formulates and defends his arguments for this view, and notes its implications for understanding the distinctiveness of Christian ethics Robert Merrihew Adams, Yale University.An Essay on Divine Authority

Is a well known author, some of his on Divine PDF ☆ books are a fascination for readers like in the An Essay on Divine Authority book, this is one of the most wanted Mark C Murphy author readers around the world.

An Essay on Divine Authority ePUB Î An Essay  PDF \
    If you re looking for a CBR and CBZ reader Scripture and tradition After exposing the inadequacies of the various arguments for the authority thesis, he develops his own solution to the problem of whether, and to what extent, God is authoritative For Murphy, divine authority is a contingent matter while created rational beings have decisive reason to subject themselves to the divine rule, they are under divine authority Essay on Divine PDF È only insofar as they have chosen to allow God s decisions to take the place of their own in their practical reasoning The author formulates and defends his arguments for this view, and notes its implications for understanding the distinctiveness of Christian ethics Robert Merrihew Adams, Yale University."/>
  • Hardcover
  • An Essay on Divine Authority
  • Mark C. Murphy
  • English
  • 19 June 2019
  • 0801440300

10 thoughts on “An Essay on Divine Authority

  1. says:

    God is a rational being, and we are rational beings Rational beings are, in large measure, self directing capable of coming to an understanding of what reasons for action there are, of assessing the features of those reasons for action relevant to deliberation, and of deciding what course of action is to be carried out in light of those reasons Thus, whenever it is suggested that one rational being is practically authoritative over another, that suggestion merits investigation to determine w God is a rational being, and we are rational beings Rational beings are, in large measure, self directing capable of coming to an understanding of what reasons for action there are, of assessing the features of those reasons for action relevant to deliberation, and of deciding what course of action is to be carried out in light of those reasons Thus, whenever it is suggested that one rational being is practically authoritative over another, that suggestion merits investigation to determine whether it is true And so the suggestion that God is authoritative over us humans, and indeed over any other created rational beings that there are, is a claim that merits investigation To determine whether it is true that God is authoritative over created rational beings, and to provide an adequate explanation of the extent of God s authority, together constitute the problem of divine authority In An Essay on Divine Authority, Murphy is in effect pioneering the treatment of a problem that has lived a long and uncomplicated life between the margins and argumentative lines of Christian philosophy Then, as Murphy suggests, the problem of divine authority was always there but has gone largely unnoticed or ignored by both theists and atheists.Now, when Murphy talks about practical authority, he is speaking about someone s being authoritative over rational beings in the domain of practical reason that is, roughly, authoritative over the reasons these beings have for acting For Murphy, practical authority consists in a kind of control that the authority has over reasons for action In the strongest version of this thesis, the practical authority can actualize decisive reasons for action for rational beings who fall under the remit of said authority and, as becomes clear from the author s drawn out discussion of philosophical counterexamples and pre theoretical intuitions, this actualizing is constitutive rather than causal This view of practical authority is, roughly, what Murphy terms the authority thesis However, in the neighbourhood of this thesis lives another that Murphy terms the compliance thesis, in which the commands of a practical authority provide decisive reasons for action but do not constitutively actualize such reasons The complication lies in whether evidence for the truth of the latter thesis has been historically and mistakenly taken as evidence for the truth of the former.Pursuing the problem, Murphy travels through various and familiar theological dwellings, looking for resources to furnish the problem of divine authority with a solution He detours through metaethical and normative divine command theories here he also suggests his trilemma argument against property identity divine command theory , God s divine perfections, and traditional moral arguments However, he finds that where the arguments drawn from these resources appear sound, they at best support the compliance thesis And where these arguments do support the authority thesis, they appear unsound So, Murphy develops his own solution to the problem of divine authority, in which rational beings such as us are not under divine authority but are, all our reasons considered, required to submit ourselves to divine authority Finally, he applies his new view tentatively to two cases, homosexuality and love thy neighbour, and finds that this view of authority suggests ways of resolving long running disputes of understanding over both of these issues.I think it s an excellent book for the student of theology or for anyone interested in Christian ethics and problems of practical reason It also finds mention and attention in the work of other notable theological works that proceed it As an atheist with an abiding interest in ethics and the philosophical history of Christianity, I have issues with Murphy s treatment of homosexuality and find there s something suspect in how the author s concern with submission to divine authority passes over textual issues and becomes submission to a particular Christian history, but I also commend the sensitivity in his energetic and sharp response to New Natural Law sensitivity that is unusual in philosophical Thomism as it s practiced by various others

  2. says:

    All of the reading I ve done on the nature and philosophy of authority has come from Hobbes, Descartes, Kant, Locke, etc Political Theorists at their root Its interesting to me how Murphy conjoins so many strictly tangible political ideals and applies them to theology.I think that Murphy does a good job in separating his argument to apply to God as construed by several primary sources Anselmian assumptions, a few variants of a biblical read and something that lies between a high orthodox tra All of the reading I ve done on the nature and philosophy of authority has come from Hobbes, Descartes, Kant, Locke, etc Political Theorists at their root Its interesting to me how Murphy conjoins so many strictly tangible political ideals and applies them to theology.I think that Murphy does a good job in separating his argument to apply to God as construed by several primary sources Anselmian assumptions, a few variants of a biblical read and something that lies between a high orthodox tradition based belief set and a natural ethic I know, strange to combine those the link is that they reexperiential than textual or a priori logical Anyway, he did a great job in identifying these forks, taking them seriously, and tracking how these differences affect his primary argument what reads to me as a Social Contract theory mixed with a meta ethical Divine Command Theory.I found three quarters of this book very tangible and application relevant His arguments threaded in each case to make conclusions about the nature of the contract between human and God and the ethical moral assumptions that go along with each The last quarter of the book, however, I felt was overly concerned with rhetoric Murphy began tracing down distinctions that seemed to wantto be able to assert this over that , even when the two largely, were different renderings of a painfully similar idea.I suppose this is one of the primary jobs of philosophy to pick apart subtle differences, with the belief that meaning is cumulative, and a small distinction at the beginning of a suppositional chain, has large ramifications at the end of it or can rather I agree with this, and so find it strange in some senses that I m holding this as a criticism of the book However, Murphy s self identified aim, even from the beginning of the work, was to trace out the consequences of different positions on Divine Authority and renderings of the Divine Person, and pull them to a crescendo of steep pragmatic consequences.From what I can gather, scholars of Divine Command theory find this book both thorough and important, and from a non experts view, I can see why Its nice to read someone so concerned about all of the variants on a largely overlooked argument Though I can t say that I m too concerned about the topics Murphy covers, I read the book to learn something new, and to see the ways that political theory and theology can be combined It was a dynamic philosophical experiment And one that I m glad I was able to join in on if only on a very small scale

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *