The Great Transformation



In this classic work of economic history and social theory, Karl Polanyi analyzes the economic and social changes brought about by the great transformation of the Industrial Revolution His analysis explains not only the deficiencies of the self regulating market, but the potentially dire social consequences of untempered market capitalism New introductory material reveals the renewed importance of Polanyi s seminal analysis in an era of globalization and free trade. Download The Great Transformation – e17streets4all.co.ukThe Great Transformation

Is a well-known author, some of his books are a fascination for readers like in the The Great Transformation book, this is one of the most wanted Karl Polanyi author readers around the world.

New Download [ The Great Transformation  ] Author [ Karl Polanyi ] – e17streets4all.co.uk
  • Paperback
  • 360 pages
  • The Great Transformation
  • Karl Polanyi
  • English
  • 01 March 2018
  • 080705643X

10 thoughts on “The Great Transformation

  1. says:

    I foolishly took it upon myself to read not only the assigned chapters, but the whole of Polanyi s magnum opus, and for the past few days have been lost in the labyrinth of 19th century poor laws and monetary policy in the Weimar Republic But this book was immensely profitable, if I may borrow a market based metaphor.In particular, three of Polanyi s simplest, most commonsensical contentions were extremely illuminating to me and greatly bolstered my ability to criticize capitalist orthodoxy.The I foolishly took it upon myself to read not only the assigned chapters, but the whole of Polanyi s magnum opus, and for the past few days have been lost in the labyrinth of 19th century poor laws and monetary policy in the Weimar Republic But this book was immensely profitable, if I may borrow a market based metaphor.In particular, three of Polanyi s simplest, most commonsensical contentions were extremely illuminating to me and greatly bolstered my ability to criticize capitalist orthodoxy.The first, on page ...

  2. says:

    I wouldn t think of reading this book without a guide Because Polanyi is an impossible readdifficult than Marx he doesn t have Marx s love of language or Marx s humor ,difficult than Hegel he doesn t have Hegel s pointed sense of knowing that his prose is torturing the poor reader If you have ever tried to read Aristotle, then you have some idea of how Polanyi writes tear duct vaporizing dry But you get something here you won t get in hegel or marx in part because he is I wouldn t think of reading this book without a guide Because Polanyi is an impossible readdifficult than Marx he doesn t have Marx s love of language or Marx s humor ,difficult than Hegel he doesn t have Hegel s pointed sense of knowing that his prose is torturing the poor reader If you have ever tried to read Aristotle, then you have some idea of how Polanyi writes tear duct vaporizing dry But you get something here you won t get in hegel or marx in part because he is building on them What you get is this the claim that markets and socialism are simultaneous in their emergence Not markets against socialism, but markets AND socialism from the beginning and always The bold claims is that without socialism of various types a pure market society couldn t exist...

  3. says:

    This is a fascinating book, I m astonished I haven t heard of it earlier.Polanyi is not your run of the mill economist he does not use equations he uses context and does not describe events in a vacuum, integrating various disciplines from the social sciences He describes four elements which comprised 19th century civilization, and which have all been swept away by the great bloodbaths of the early 20th century the gold standard, the international balance of power, the classical liberal s This is a fascinating book, I m astonished I haven t heard of it ear...

  4. says:

    Polanyi understood economicsrealistically than most economists, and understood that economics does not stand alone, but exists within a larger social institutional context I know that sounds a bit stiff But until you get it, you will suspect that economists don t know something you don t You might even believe in the almighty market as something that exists outside of culture and politics, like the revolutions of the planets Economics is always, like religion or politics, something w Polanyi understood economicsrealistically than most economists, and understood that economics does not stand alone, but exists within a larger social insti...

  5. says:

    I read this a few years ago.I ve been thinking about it again after reading Streeck s stunning How Will Capitalism End Maybe the key concept here is embeddedness Capitalist society relies on pre capitalist social formations to sustain itself The market on its own is an insufficient foundation for the spiritual and social bonds that constitute a people as opposed to just an aggregate of individuals.Thus it may follow t...

  6. says:

    The principle point made by this book is that the attempted transition from a market embedded in society to a society embedded in a self regulating market resulted in the collapse of 19th century civilisation, in the form of global conflict and economic recession Polanyi asserts that free markets, whereby labour, land and capital become fictitious commodities, result in massive social dislocation Socialism exists to counter this, giving a double movement , as recognisable now as in 1944 In h The principle point made by this book is that the attempted transition from a market embedded in society to ...

  7. says:

    I really didn t like this book, mostly because I felt that it was poorly formulated and based on a lot of incomplete examples Every time Polanyi tried to prove something he d give 4 examples of random indigenous populations in which the event occurred All of his examples seemed like exceptions rather than base cases for a rule, and his strange statements like previously to our time the 1940s Industrial Revolution period in general no economy has ever existed that, even in principle, was con I really didn t like this book, mostly because I felt that it was poorly formulated and based on a lot of incomplete examples Every time Polanyi tried to prove something he d give 4 examples of random indigenous populations in which the event occurred All of his examples seemed like exceptions rather than base cases for a rule, and his strange statements like previously to our time the 1940s Industrial Revolution period in general no economy has ever existed that, even in principle, was ...

  8. says:

    Polanyi s Great Transformation is a classic of economic history in its older, political economy mode, and a book too often forgotten in an era where economics is seen as a kind of physics, a discipline about ineluctable mathematical laws Polanyi looks at the social consequences of unfettered capitalism ...

  9. says:

    When I was in graduate school, I read Michael Polanyi s Personal Knowledge Towards a Post Critical Philosophy 1958 and was impressed with the way in which he argues that positivism gives a false account of knowing Having had to endure the righteous fundamentalism of positivist professors as an undergraduate, it was wonderfully refreshing to encounter a book that, in a few...

  10. says:

    I have to admit that I took fifty one weeks to finish this The effect of that is that my take on it is somewhat disjointed Hence no proper review The four stars 3.5 really are because the author presents some excellent historical analysis and pulls that together to synthesize extremely original ideas of economic development I m surprised we don t seereferences to Polanyi s theories.I did have some concerns with his choice of historical events As is o...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *